Matthew Albanese
matthew albanese is a photography and model artist. he creates these tiny model sets that look real when photographed from the right angle. his work related to what ive been doing as i wanted to do camera trickery and using photoshop to manipulate environments just like Matthew Albanese does him self
He pays attention to every tiny bit of detail in his work creating a believable environment and what’s more incredible is the fact that there all made out of every day house hold materials. His landscapes are inspired by a range of different things such as accidents he makes, one was created when cooking, he says that he accidentally dropped some paprika on the table and it looked to him like a scene from planet mars which inspired his mars rover landing piece.
Albanese work are all remakes of environments he has seen and been inspired by. His environments are painstaking put together piece by piece by hand and some take months to complete. I would say that some of his work is also inspired by global warming and climate change with his nature pieces of work and some of man’s accomplishments like the moon landing and the mars rover.
this image is his landscape that hes finished but as you can see from this angle you can tell what materials hew used and doesn't really look like much of an environment.
but when taken from the right angle and the right lighting this is the final image. which looks like a real environment and its believable. all his photos that he produces are all real and not been photoshoped so he heavily relies on lighting and position to get his environments believable and correct.
a few more examples of his work
Friday, 16 May 2014
Adam Adamowicz and Tabor Robak
adam Adamowizcs and Tabor Robak
Adamowizcs works in the gaming industry and is not really a fine artist any more which I did not really understand at first before giving my presentation. From the presentation and feedback I realized that this artist’s work does not have a fine art concept behind even though it is art. At the end of presenting this started off a little discussion about what art is. Some people felt that his work is not art as it’s made for games and some thought it is art as art can be anything. I personally feel that this artist’s work is art and I do adore his art but now I know it’s not of fine art concept.
I took into consideration that his work does not fit into a fine art background after the little debate that was started between the people in the audience, about whether his work is art or not and if it could fit in to a fine art background. I then had the task of finding out how this kind of art can fit in to a fine art. I researched into the area of digital/ game art style work and how it can fit into a more fine art concept. I remembered an artist that I was fond of at the freeze trip to London that stood out to me. This artists name was Tabor Robak, his work was presented on 4 LCD HD screens which showed his digital work that he’s created using 3D software. This shows that 3D computer digital art can be of a fine art concept. Does this make it any different to Adamowicz work if we judge this on just software used and final outcomes?
One point that came up is that Adamowicz work is not art, as it’s not presented in a gallery. If we just look purely at software used and final out comes we have two identical outcomes. So what makes Adamowicz work not art and Robak’s work art, just because it’s presented in a gallery?
The answer to the above question is opinion based and depends on the individual and how they feel about digital art. An older person who has not grew up with digital art might not view this as art, whereas younger people who have grew up with digital art will be more understandable to it. Based on these questions given during the feedback I conducted a little research by asking a few different age generations their opinions on digital art. I first asked my granddad about what he thinks of this type of art (who is currently 90). His opinion on this style of art is that he does not understand and does not want to get his head around it. I then asked my mum and dad about this type of art and they think it is a type of art but do not see how it fits in with a gallery. My younger sister (who is 14) thinks it is an art form and thinks there should be more of it in galleries as she is also into playing games like myself. I think since the digital world is expanding and is taking over nearly almost everything and it costs a lot less to digitally paint something that it might take over art in the future. The down fall to digital painting though is that it has to be presented on a screen or viewed on a screen for it to be successful as printing it off can pixelate the image and it just does not look as good.
Adam Adamowicz work
"Among the artists responsible for illustrating the first fledgling looks during development was Adam Adamowicz, a concept artist best known for his numerous Fallout 3 designs. Adamowicz is no longer with us—he passed away due to lung cancer complications last February—but his exceptional skill lives on through the piles of environment and character concepts he created for Skyrim. Beyond marveling at the amount of Adamowicz's ideas that appear in the final game, it's worthwhile to appreciate these illustrations as standalone works of art."
these are some of his digital paintings that I also presented in my presentation for this artist.
Tabor Robak
these images displayed on 4 LCD screens are of Tabor Robaks exhibition that I saw in London's Freeze gallery which shows that digital art can be displayed in gallerys and can be of a fine art nature.
This artists work is all digital based. I really like this work because its a different approach at art. After studying the game art course here at DMU last year I know how tough it is to create art digitally and does take some skill and getting use too. The bottom right photo of a painting of a beach is done digitally using a graphics tablet. I have done digital paintings my self and i find them very bizarre. Naturally we put a pencil, pen or paintbrush on to our materiel and look at what were doing and where our hand is drawing but with a graphics tablet drawing on a board and looking at the monitor is hard to get use to and feels abnormal.
Banksy
Banksy
"Banksy is a pseudonymous United Kingdom-based graffiti artist, political activist, film director, and painter. His satirical street art and subversive epigrams combine dark humour with graffiti executed in a distinctive stencilling technique"
Banksy I like mentioned in my previous study about graffiti art, is a political graffiti artist who spray paints and stencils his emotions towards certain political issues that are going across the world. this one is similar to what I was trying to show in my drawing project. He has chosen certain slogans to represent his image which is what I started to look into to go with the images and emotions I was trying to express through just an image or drawing.
this image is what I have made using Photoshop. I took the images in Liverpool of a homeless guy with his dog. Like Bankys work my work is to show emotions behind my images that have a narrative behind them to.
these are some of his graffiti art that have a dark humour narrative behind them
this link below goes to the page i got these images of Banksys work
http://www.businessinsider.com/best-banksy-works-2013-10?op=1
"Banksy is a pseudonymous United Kingdom-based graffiti artist, political activist, film director, and painter. His satirical street art and subversive epigrams combine dark humour with graffiti executed in a distinctive stencilling technique"
Banksy I like mentioned in my previous study about graffiti art, is a political graffiti artist who spray paints and stencils his emotions towards certain political issues that are going across the world. this one is similar to what I was trying to show in my drawing project. He has chosen certain slogans to represent his image which is what I started to look into to go with the images and emotions I was trying to express through just an image or drawing.
My image that I have made |
this image is what I have made using Photoshop. I took the images in Liverpool of a homeless guy with his dog. Like Bankys work my work is to show emotions behind my images that have a narrative behind them to.
these are some of his graffiti art that have a dark humour narrative behind them
this link below goes to the page i got these images of Banksys work
http://www.businessinsider.com/best-banksy-works-2013-10?op=1
political graffiti art
I was looking in to the theme of political art for my drawing project and where it is found most common. Finding it in art gallerys is tricky to find and the best one so far was Conrad Atkinson. I wasn't sure where to find any political art but then i realised it can be all around me. when walking past building you see graffiti sprayed on wall displaying how some one feels by some thing thats affecting them with just a simple image and a few words but the meaning behind the image and words it what counts and what make it political.
after this i was then pursing the idea of is graffiti art even in a political manner or is it just plain vandalism and how far does it go back?
I think that Graffiti can be seen as an expressive, inspirational form of art and to others it is seen as unnecessary vandalism ruining public, private, historical and valued properties in communities. There are many graffiti artists, some well-known artists are Blu, Dust, Elbow-Toe, Jean-Michael Basquiat, who all express graffiti art in different ways using different medias to create their pieces some with a political feel to them but over all graffiti is an expression.
Modern graffiti comes in many different types of forms from toilet door messages to spray painted memorials done by famous graffiti artists and whether or not they are seen as vandalism depends on how the message has been delivered through the graffiti to the viewer. Graffiti has evolved over time and is used in a number of different medias such as; photo images, spray paint, acrylic paint, collage, marker pen, carvings, scratching and stencil. Graffiti goes back many of years from the earliest as cave drawings which are a form of graffiti with them being scratched and carved into walls. Ancient Greeks, Ancient Romans and Ancient Egyptians practiced graffiti by carving into tombs, walls and sculptures. Graffiti is used in different cultures such as; Ancient Greece, Roman Empire, Saudi Arabia, Egypt and the Vikings used graffiti in their culture. They would carve out important events which occurred so that it was not forgot. Now their paintings and carvings are seen as art because of how detailed some of their carvings are without using the tools we have today. Many years ago it was seen as a way of alerting people in some way which was done by invaders or famous people leaving a mark so that people know they existed in that time.
Graffiti has evolved into different forms over the years and a popular form is Identification graffiti, which is known as‘tagging` is done by graffiti artists spraying their name or code name on a wall, some‘tagging` can be done appealing with big graffiti styled letters and very colourful where as some is seen as vandalism. Taki 183 is a graffiti artist who does ‘tagging` Taki is an influential graffiti writer. His tag is short for Demetaki which is his birth name and 183 is the number of his home address. He was the first New Yorker to start graffiti writing and it all taken off from their which inspired many other graffiti artists.
Blu is another Graffiti artist who uses different Medias to create his art. He has created really big graffiti pieces on buildings which can be seen from long distances away. He has done some graffiti art in London in 2007but become noticeable in 1999 when his graffiti career started and he was limited to the typical spray paint medium. “This series of graffiti animations is nothing short of amazing”this quote is for one of his animation artwork pieces called MUTO a wall-painted animation. An artist who has become noticeable is Elbow-Toe and his graffiti art work is done in collage. His work is not really seen as vandalism and is seen as an art form.
Because of how ElbowToes work is created it is more of an art form than vandalism because people like to view his work and see all the detail that he puts into his work. He had to start of by painting and stencilling on walls so he could become noticed and because of his graffiti, which people like, it made him successful and then he started presenting his work in galleries. If he did not start by creating his graffiti he would not have been noticed and would not have been a successful graffiti artist. Jon Burgerman is another successful graffiti artist who started off by doing graffiti on walls and later his career became successful and he began doing graffiti on walls, books, tees iPhone cases, has designed for the Little Big Planet video game and has teamed up with Ustwo to create an IPhone application called ‘Inkstrumental’ and he had created all of the doodle characters. His work is seen as a positive type of graffiti which is very creative and inspiring to view.
Graffiti can also be seen as nothing more than vandalism by some audiences. The older generation of people for example my Granddad said that “graffiti is just mess on wall that ruins the environment” I can also agree that a lot of graffiti which is know as “tagging” where someone sprays their nickname or a code name is just a form of vandalism. The graffiti artist known as Taki 183 who I have discussed earlier, some of his work is just his name sprayed on a wall and some people might view that as vandalism because anybody can spray words on a wall but not everybody can create an art memorial including; spray paint, collage, photos, marker pen, paint or stencils. Taki’s work can relate to being naive graffiti, to some people his work is just words sprayed on a wall for no appropriate reason. Naive graffiti is vandalism because it can be insulting to some viewers and costs a lot of money for people who own private properties or community lots to have graffiti removed. The UK government spends 1 billion pounds a year paying for graffiti to be removed from UK government and council properties and communities “Vandalism is a costly crime. The National Bureau of Justice reports that in the year 2000, vandalism accounted for $1.6 billion in damage to households alone. Those who are left to clean up the aftermath and deal with the trauma of property damage often are left wondering why their property became a target”. Even in America this is a costly problem for the American government to deal with. A common sight for naive graffiti is the local parks where teenagers and children vandalise the park equipment because of lack of respect for the equipment, the environment and children who have to view their vandalism using the equipment.
Graffiti artist who have produced graffiti on walls then reproduced them on to canvases, their work is not really seen as graffiti because of them being on canvas and not on a wall. If it is on a canvas then it is viewed as a design, painting, animation or print, which means it’s now seen as an art form rather than graffiti or vandalism. Blu who has created animation is a graffiti artist because his animations involve some thing being painted on a wall outside. Being a graffiti artists is a risky career for some graffiti artists, the graffiti artist know as Alan Ket who has produced a lot of graffiti in different location and he was caught out doing graffiti illegally because of his name appearing in his work which was enough for him to be charged with a number of different offenses; “14 criminal counts, including trespass, criminal mischief and making graffiti. If convicted, he could potentially face decades in prison and huge financial penalties” He pleaded that he was not guilty and was let off because he claimed it was someone else who copied his tag and he could of face a few years sentence in jail, if there was more evidence to back up their suspicions. Graffiti can be a risky career route to go down and is difficult to become successful from it because of it being a crime and illegal if the artists did not ask for permission then they could be charged with a number of different offences if they were caught, It is not always a successful career.
People’s opinions on art which I have found on the internet discuss whether or not they think that graffiti is an art form or not. “You think its art when someone sneaks around and spray paints anything on the wall of your business or your home, or the railroad car you own? Hardly, it’s pure vandalism done for the pleasure of the vandal who did the work (or in some cases to make a gangs turf.” An article from the Warrington Guardian I have found on the views of graffiti in the local community. “When is graffiti art, and when is it vandalism? Many people who despair of the way graffiti vandals spray slogans on public transport and public buildings would be surprised to hear that it has now been elevated, by some, to an art form. Street art gains high prices on internet auction sites and the National Gallery has recently purchased a collection of 'street art'.” This shows that graffiti is more known as ‘street art’ rather than graffiti and it is becoming more popular because the graffiti artists who did the street art have to recreate their work and sell them to their fans who see their work as inspiring and creative. “If graffiti so-called artists think it so beautiful, then why don't they put it on their own house? You never see a graffiti vandal putting these paintings on their own house because they are NOT ART.” Graffiti artists only spray paint in daring places where it is seen as a risky spot for example a train in a well-guarded subway because then they are proud with their accomplishment and then other graffiti artists from rival gangs have to compete to beat there spot so that their spot was more risky and they can claim the territory as theirs and finish it with a ‘tag’
Thursday, 15 May 2014
conrad Atkinson
Conrad Atkinson
http://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/jonathanjonesblog/2012/nov/15/national-portrait-gallery-gerry-adams
like my prime minster drawing of David Cameron this gut that condrad Atkinson was a hated figure and cause a lot of dispute to why it was displayed in an art gallery amounts piece of art.
"Gerry Adams was once a hate figure on the British mainland. The leader of Sinn Féin was in his day as reviled as Abu Qatada is today. In 1988 Margaret Thatcher, then prime minister, banned his voice from being broadcast, to "starve the terrorist and the hijacker of the oxygen of publicity on which they depend"; yet nearly a quarter of a century on, this former bogeyman is to receive a striking artistic accolade from the British establishment."
I got this quote from the link above which you can see this art wasn't much appreciated. If i were to just simply display my drawing of the prime minister and put it on its own with maybe a flag of Great Britain as the back ground it would cause mixed feelings from people just like the painting above did. people who have suffered from Cameron's decisions just like I have my self from the bed room tax situation would anger and kind of insult these people by showing such a thing. the thought that some one has took the time to even draw or paint them then display them would make people angry.
"National Portrait Gallery brings us face to face with Gerry Adams"
"The London gallery, by purchasing Conrad Atkinson's painting of the Sinn Féin leader, has made an interesting move at a tricky time for Northern Irish reconciliation"
Conrad Atkinson is a political artist that dale mentioned to during a tutorial. the link to a bit of information about this artist can be found on the link belowhttp://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/jonathanjonesblog/2012/nov/15/national-portrait-gallery-gerry-adams
like my prime minster drawing of David Cameron this gut that condrad Atkinson was a hated figure and cause a lot of dispute to why it was displayed in an art gallery amounts piece of art.
"Gerry Adams was once a hate figure on the British mainland. The leader of Sinn Féin was in his day as reviled as Abu Qatada is today. In 1988 Margaret Thatcher, then prime minister, banned his voice from being broadcast, to "starve the terrorist and the hijacker of the oxygen of publicity on which they depend"; yet nearly a quarter of a century on, this former bogeyman is to receive a striking artistic accolade from the British establishment."
I got this quote from the link above which you can see this art wasn't much appreciated. If i were to just simply display my drawing of the prime minister and put it on its own with maybe a flag of Great Britain as the back ground it would cause mixed feelings from people just like the painting above did. people who have suffered from Cameron's decisions just like I have my self from the bed room tax situation would anger and kind of insult these people by showing such a thing. the thought that some one has took the time to even draw or paint them then display them would make people angry.
portfolio
A3 size print
11.7 x 16.5 inches
made using Photoshop for drawing project
A3 size print
11.7 x 16.5 inches
made using Photoshop for drawing project
A3 size print
11.7 x 16.5 inches
made using Photoshop for drawing project
A3 size print
11.7 x 16.5 inches
made using Photoshop for drawing project
A3 size print
11.7 x 16.5 inches
made using Photoshop for drawing project
A3 size print
11.7 x 16.5 inches
made using Photoshop for self directed
A3 size print
11.7 x 16.5 inches
made using Photoshop for self directed project
A3 size print
11.7 x 16.5 inches
made using Photoshop for self directed project
snap fish print
10 x 15 inches
made using Photoshop for self directed project
snap fish size print
20 x 30 inches
made using Photoshop for self directed project
snap fish size print
20 x 30 inches
made using Photoshop for self directed project
A3 size print
11.7 x 16.5 inches
made using Photoshop for self directed project
A3 size print
11.7 x 16.5 inches
made using Photoshop for self directed project
snap fish size print
10 x 15 inches
made using Photoshop for self directed project
A3 size print
11.7 x 16.5 inches
made using Photoshop for self directed project
drawing final out comes
final digital out comes
this images was a composition i thought about in the way richer people treat poorer people. I faced the two richer men facing there backs away from the poorer guy as this how he is seen as not really there. I used a flag as a background as this a regular scene through out Britain with social divides.
this one is a more colour full one I created by using different filters in Photoshop and blended most of all my previous drawings together to create a collage of society's and separation.
this one i was yet again playing around with different compositions and colours. I used this drawing and put it against a photo of what represents him best.
this was just again an experiment of composition and what represents social divides and classes.
I have added some money slogans that I have heard in my life. this one says "the root of all evil" I thought that it also has a kind of narrative behind this in a humorous way.
this one was a photo i taken last year at of a tree that is clinging on to life yet we chop them down as we cant grow money of them but the narrative behind this is that in a way we do as with out trees we cant physically make money.
this one is based on the slogan money kills. it does physically decide on life and death in a lot of situations such as wars started and people life become less valuable than money such as the word "priceless" but with a different narrative about it. we die by money and live by money itself.
this image shows you that you don't always need all the money in the world to be happy with our lives.
this image shows the calm and peacefulness of these animals grazing in a field and how we have to be slaves for food and to have a shelter over our heads.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)